Related Blog Articles

Your Trust Could Reach the 37% Tax Bracket at Just $16,000


You have made room in your life for love again. There are new routines, more birthdays to remember, and people at your table who were not there a few years ago. You want this family to feel like a family, not two sides keeping score.
Then a quieter question arrives: if you die first, how do you care for your spouse and still leave something for your children? Second marriage estate planning starts with that question. Asking it does not mean you distrust anyone. It means both promises matter to you.
When I talk through this with you, I want to understand what each promise means before we discuss documents. Does your spouse need income, a place to live, or both? Do your children need support soon, or are you planning for an inheritance later?
You are a blended family if one or both of you have children from a prior relationship. Even if you have no children of your own, consider how you want to provide for your spouse’s children. You might choose to include them as you would your own children, a powerful expression of belonging. I help you put those wishes into your plan rather than leave them assumed.
“Take care of my spouse” and “leave the rest to my children” sound compatible. They are not, however, the same instruction.
If you leave assets outright to your spouse, your spouse generally owns them. Unless an enforceable arrangement or other legal restriction applies, your spouse can spend those assets or leave what remains to different beneficiaries. Matching wills alone do not necessarily make your shared intentions binding.
That does not require betrayal. Your spouse could need years of care, support another loved one, or remarry. A decision that feels reasonable at the time could produce an inheritance very different from the one you pictured.
Consider a hypothetical example. You have two adult children, a spouse who relies on your income, and $800,000 you hope will support both goals. “My spouse gets it now, and my children get $400,000 later” does not work if the same dollars must also cover whatever your spouse needs over the next 25 years.
The first decision is whether your children should receive a defined amount, a percentage, or whatever remains after your spouse’s needs are met. Those are different promises, and you deserve to know which one your plan actually makes.
The bottom line: Providing for your spouse and reserving an inheritance for your children are separate goals. Your plan needs to say how each will be funded.
A trust can be designed to provide for your spouse during life and direct remaining assets to your children afterward. The terms determine what your spouse receives, when principal can be used, and who inherits what remains.
But “in trust” is not a complete answer. If principal can be spent for your spouse’s support, the amount left for your children can shrink. Restricting who eventually inherits does not guarantee how much they will inherit.
Return to the $800,000 example. One arrangement might make the entire amount available for your spouse’s permitted needs, with the remainder for your children. Another might reserve a portion for your children at your death and use the balance for your spouse. Neither choice is automatically better; the question is whether the resources match the promises.
Some families fund the two promises separately, for example with life insurance held in a properly structured trust for your children. Their inheritance then comes from that policy rather than depending on what remains after your spouse’s needs are met.
When I help you consider those choices, we also discuss what should remain flexible after you die. Your spouse might need to move, face a medical diagnosis, or live much longer than expected. At the same time, you may want the identity of the eventual beneficiaries to remain fixed.
With a joint trust, your spouse may be able to change who inherits your share after you die unless its terms restrict that power. Your plan can set your share aside at your death for your chosen beneficiaries while still providing for your spouse.
A separate trust also needs the right terms. I review who can change beneficiaries, when money can be distributed, and what changes can be made to how the trust is managed. Those answers depend on the document and applicable law, not just the type of trust.
The bottom line: A useful plan distinguishes flexibility for your spouse’s life from the ability to redirect the inheritance you intended for your children.
Your spouse may hear “the children inherit the house” and wonder whether they will have to move. Your children may hear “my spouse can stay” and wonder whether they will wait decades, pay the expenses, or ever receive the property.
Neither concern makes someone selfish. A home carries both financial needs and emotional history. You can care about your spouse’s stability and your children’s inheritance at the same time.
If your plan allows your spouse to remain in a home intended eventually for your children, work through the practical questions:
Suppose, just for illustration, the home needs a $24,000 roof replacement. An instruction that says only “my spouse may live there” leaves an important expense unresolved. Deciding responsibility now is kinder than leaving your family to negotiate it later.
State law matters here. Spousal inheritance rights, marital property rules, and protections for a family home can limit what your documents accomplish. In Florida, for example, if you are survived by a spouse, your will or trust generally cannot leave your homestead to your children instead. Your plan must work under the law where it applies, not just sound fair around the kitchen table.
The bottom line: A housing promise needs clear terms about expenses, decisions, and what happens when your spouse’s circumstances change.
If your spouse receives support from a trust and your children inherit what remains, they have different interests in the same assets. A trustee, the person or institution responsible for administering the trust, needs to follow its terms and the duties imposed by law.
Choosing that person deserves more thought than naming whoever is oldest or best with spreadsheets. Would your child be comfortable reviewing a request from your spouse? Would your spouse feel able to ask? Would an independent trustee reduce the personal strain, and would the cost fit the assets involved?
I also want your account arrangements reviewed alongside the trust. An employer retirement plan may require your spouse’s consent before another beneficiary can be named. Review retirement beneficiaries after any marriage. Do not change a designation without checking the plan rules and the tax consequences.
The same conversation includes your home’s title, insurance, and any obligations under a divorce settlement or marital agreement. Your financial advisor, your insurance professional, and I all need to understand the intended outcome, not just our individual piece of it.
Finally, consider explaining the purpose of your choices while you can. You do not have to disclose every dollar. You can tell your spouse that their housing matters and tell your children that their inheritance was considered, rather than leave silence for them to interpret.
The bottom line: Clear instructions, suitable decision-makers, and coordinated assets reduce the questions your loved ones must answer for themselves.
An ongoing Personal Family Lawyer® relationship gives these decisions a place to be revisited as your life changes. Before there is a loss, I help you connect your family’s priorities with your legal plan and the work of your other advisors. A move, retirement, or change in your spouse’s care needs can be a reason to review the balance again.
If you have an ongoing Personal Family Lawyer relationship, your family has someone who already knows the plan, the people you chose, and why the arrangements were made. After your death, that familiarity can help them understand the next legal steps. We would separately agree on any help carrying out those steps. They should not have to reconstruct your intentions from a few remembered conversations.
The bottom line: Stewardship means keeping your plan connected to the people it serves, before and after the inheritance becomes real.
Write down two sentences: “I want my spouse to have…” and “I want my children to receive…” Be specific about housing, income, timing, and anything you want reserved. Bring those priorities, your existing documents, and your account information to a planning conversation before making changes.
As a Personal Family Lawyer firm, I help you create a Life & Legacy Plan that reflects your family, resources, and values. I do not do one-size-fits-all planning. You should understand what your spouse can rely on, what you intend for your children, and which choices require coordination with your other advisors.
The relationship doesn’t end when the documents are signed. When something happens, your family knows to call me. Schedule a complimentary 15-minute discovery call: https://bookings.cloud.microsoft/book/bookings@succession-plus.com/s/WGz7l2mrQ0ibZJ7joYe5cQ2?ismsaljsauthenabled
This article is a service of Bret Christiansen, a Personal Family Lawyer® Firm. We don’t just draft documents; we ensure you make informed and empowered decisions about life and death, for yourself and the people you love. That’s why we offer a Life & Legacy Planning® Session, during which you will get more financially organized than you’ve ever been before and make all the best choices for the people you love. You can begin by calling our office today to schedule a Life & Legacy Planning Session.
The content is sourced from Personal Family Lawyer for use by Personal Family Lawyer firms, a source believed to be providing accurate information. This material was created for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as ERISA, tax, legal, or investment advice. If you are seeking legal advice specific to your needs, such advice services must be obtained on your own, separate from this educational material.
© 2026 Personal Family Lawyer, all rights reserved. Licensed for use by member firms.

